No answer?
-
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 5:59 pm
Now the carmarthen town manager released a letter saying we were the one to mess up negotiations. Why do I feel this isn't the last we've heard of this problem
The last paragraph clearly shows they are the ones trying to get more money for him by getting him trials to bigger clubs *apparently*. But we need to make a statement ASAP.USADAGGER nick wrote:Now the carmarthen town manager released a letter saying we were the one to mess up negotiations. Why do I feel this isn't the last we've heard of this problem
- ThatRoundThing
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2013 11:40 am
According to other Welsh websites they are still smarting that Justin Edinburgh turned down the chance to sign Doidge.
http://welsh-premier.com/index.php/late ... -the-rocks
I doubt very much that there was any fault with how our club conducted itself in the matter, Carmarthen looked to be after the best payday they can get which is fair enough but the player, an agent or their club should have confirmed whether the player was available on a free or not. We have made many signings this summer and none appear to have had problems of this kind.
http://welsh-premier.com/index.php/late ... -the-rocks
I doubt very much that there was any fault with how our club conducted itself in the matter, Carmarthen looked to be after the best payday they can get which is fair enough but the player, an agent or their club should have confirmed whether the player was available on a free or not. We have made many signings this summer and none appear to have had problems of this kind.
There's clearly fault in how we've conducted ourselves. It was our responsibility to check with them about what the situation was with regards to a fee, but instead have asked the player who wouldn't be in a position to know for definite.ThatRoundThing wrote:According to other Welsh websites they are still smarting that Justin Edinburgh turned down the chance to sign Doidge.
http://welsh-premier.com/index.php/late ... -the-rocks
I doubt very much that there was any fault with how our club conducted itself in the matter, Carmarthen looked to be after the best payday they can get which is fair enough but the player, an agent or their club should have confirmed whether the player was available on a free or not. We have made many signings this summer and none appear to have had problems of this kind.
To have their chairman state that he provided a time he'd be available to talk when we claim that he didn't respond at all also looks pretty poor. Why were we even using an agent to talk to them? Why not do it directly, like we used to be capable of?
Why did Burnett give the interview which pointed the blame at them? The only thing that was ever likely to achieve was a backlash from them. I'd expect the same from us if a club were badmouthing us when they were trying to sign a player of ours.
No it doesn't. It shows they're trying to help him out. They're not going to be in line for much of a fee when he's out of contract and has already been effectively rejected by Newport and ourselves.matt_drfc wrote:The last paragraph clearly shows they are the ones trying to get more money for him by getting him trials to bigger clubs *apparently*. But we need to make a statement ASAP.USADAGGER nick wrote:Now the carmarthen town manager released a letter saying we were the one to mess up negotiations. Why do I feel this isn't the last we've heard of this problem
Is he out of contract?Adrian wrote:No it doesn't. It shows they're trying to help him out. They're not going to be in line for much of a fee when he's out of contract and has already been effectively rejected by Newport and ourselves.matt_drfc wrote:The last paragraph clearly shows they are the ones trying to get more money for him by getting him trials to bigger clubs *apparently*. But we need to make a statement ASAP.USADAGGER nick wrote:Now the carmarthen town manager released a letter saying we were the one to mess up negotiations. Why do I feel this isn't the last we've heard of this problem
- ThatRoundThing
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2013 11:40 am
Adrian wrote:No it doesn't. It shows they're trying to help him out. They're not going to be in line for much of a fee when he's out of contract and has already been effectively rejected by Newport and ourselves.matt_drfc wrote:The last paragraph clearly shows they are the ones trying to get more money for him by getting him trials to bigger clubs *apparently*. But we need to make a statement ASAP.USADAGGER nick wrote:Now the carmarthen town manager released a letter saying we were the one to mess up negotiations. Why do I feel this isn't the last we've heard of this problem
If you read the interview in the Post, Wayne is reported as having said that he had asked (a third party I presume) if the player was available on a free otherwise we wouldn't be able to afford him before inviting him down for a trial. The interview goes on to say "he even" (the player) said he was available on a free... When asked, after the trial.
According to this he is http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/christia ... ler/255353matt_drfc wrote:
Is he out of contract?
If it's wrong and he was under contract, then:
a) why did we think we'd get him for nothing?
b) we shouldn't have been talking to him about signing before agreeing terms with his club first
I've read it thanks.ThatRoundThing wrote:
If you read the interview in the Post, Wayne is reported as having said that he had asked (a third party I presume) if the player was available on a free otherwise we wouldn't be able to afford him before inviting him down for a trial. The interview goes on to say "he even" (the player) said he was available on a free... When asked, after the trial.
This is the important bit:
It's not at all clear who was actually asked.“We offered Christian a deal and was told he would be able to leave on a free to a higher league club, but that’s not the case,” said Burnett.
“I asked before his trial whether he would be available on a free otherwise we wouldn’t be able to afford him and I was told he was available. We wouldn’t have pursued the deal otherwise.
“I spoke to the player last Thursday and asked him whether he would be keen to make the move to London.
“He said that’d be okay and he would love the chance to play in the Football League, he even said he was available on a free.”
This whole think makes both clubs look bad. Let's not pretend that our shit don't stink. We're just as culpable in this as they are.
- ThatRoundThing
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2013 11:40 am
Funny enough that's the same article I read, Our club obviously spoke to someone connected with the club and also followed the correct procedure, according to their chairman's statement, in making initial enquiries about the player.
Maybe there are one or two half truths by both clubs but I doubt if I will get the full facts that warrant me comment further.
Maybe there are one or two half truths by both clubs but I doubt if I will get the full facts that warrant me comment further.
So you agree that the article does not explicitly say that we spoke to someone at their club about any potential fee?ThatRoundThing wrote:Funny enough that's the same article I read, Our club obviously spoke to someone connected with the club and also followed the correct procedure, according to their chairman's statement, in making initial enquiries about the player.
Maybe there are one or two half truths by both clubs but I doubt if I will get the full facts that warrant me comment further.
In your earlier post you said you presume we spoke to a third party based in that article.
Like I said, lets not pretend that we are completely blameless in this.
There are elements of unprofessional behaviour, but if the two parties only one is professional.
-
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 1:39 pm
I dont think you will find a single person on here who has tried to make it we are "completely blameless"
In addition, its a bit rich you making assumptions regarding people making or not making supposed telephone calls when unless im wrong you were the biggest criticiser of people believing WB story that Hoyte never returned a call made to him.
The tone in your posts recently tell me you have a massive bee in your bonnett with wayne burnett and l have the feeling theres nothing he can do aside from win us promotion which will change your view on him. Am l wrong??
In addition, its a bit rich you making assumptions regarding people making or not making supposed telephone calls when unless im wrong you were the biggest criticiser of people believing WB story that Hoyte never returned a call made to him.
The tone in your posts recently tell me you have a massive bee in your bonnett with wayne burnett and l have the feeling theres nothing he can do aside from win us promotion which will change your view on him. Am l wrong??
You've got this spot on, couldn't word it as well as you have loldagger4eva wrote:I dont think you will find a single person on here who has tried to make it we are "completely blameless"
In addition, its a bit rich you making assumptions regarding people making or not making supposed telephone calls when unless im wrong you were the biggest criticiser of people believing WB story that Hoyte never returned a call made to him.
The tone in your posts recently tell me you have a massive bee in your bonnett with wayne burnett and l have the feeling theres nothing he can do aside from win us promotion which will change your view on him. Am l wrong??