Dammit! 38*Lcbdagger wrote:I'm not convinced even a 3 year old Pele was all that back in the dayRichie wrote:I'd rather a 31 year old Connell than a 3 year old Cureton personally.
Trailists
Still looking at Cureton, Connell, Guedioura, Fitzpatrick & taking George Porter on aswell. I'd defo take Porter, impressed me whenever I've seen him! Would take Connell aswell, appears to be doing well and I'd take Cureton no question. Will have to see Guedioura and Fitzpatrick..
-
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 10:54 pm
- Location: Walking In A Woodall Wonderland
Was at the game today, the ones who caught my eye were Green(?), played left back and centre half and looked good. (Is he here permanently?) also Goldberg when he came on. Porter and Fitzpatrick were a bit meh but Connell looks a decent option. Nouble is enormous but doesn't do much. Connors played CM and looked a bit lost. Felt a bit sorry for cousins as well, sitting on the bench all game even in a friendly.
And our favourite Scott Mcgleish was up front for them, still his old self and not looking as fat as I thought he would.
And our favourite Scott Mcgleish was up front for them, still his old self and not looking as fat as I thought he would.