Wrexham & Macclesfield
-
- Posts: 648
- Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2013 7:56 pm
Always interesting how people see things differently isn't it.
Some saying the sub should have been earlier and that Morgan should have been the one to come off, but you could argue it worked spot on as we then got what looked like the winner, set up by Morgan!!!
Likewise some thought Cheek was excellent, I actually thought he drifted in and out of the game in the second half. As I say, interesting how people view things differently.
What I am sure everyone will agree on is that we were a little unlucky to say the least!! I thought for effort and endeavour and energy we were superb and deserved at least a point.
However, it is another loss and another game without a goal. I would be interested to see the stats, but it seems often under Stilly we have a ropey October and/or November, and that is proving to be the case again (I await to be shouted down and provided with evidence to the contrary)!!!
Some saying the sub should have been earlier and that Morgan should have been the one to come off, but you could argue it worked spot on as we then got what looked like the winner, set up by Morgan!!!
Likewise some thought Cheek was excellent, I actually thought he drifted in and out of the game in the second half. As I say, interesting how people view things differently.
What I am sure everyone will agree on is that we were a little unlucky to say the least!! I thought for effort and endeavour and energy we were superb and deserved at least a point.
However, it is another loss and another game without a goal. I would be interested to see the stats, but it seems often under Stilly we have a ropey October and/or November, and that is proving to be the case again (I await to be shouted down and provided with evidence to the contrary)!!!
The ref was looking at the linesman to see if there was anything.ARNU wrote:So yesterday the ref just let it go anyway, didn't even acknowledge the infringement, the Lino was scratching his arse so didn't see it either. Lewy got sent off twice for the same thing.
Lewington wasnt sent off twice for catching the mall in his area and then carrying it out.
Open to interpretation. If he picked it up when a daggers player would have beaten the last defender to the ball, you could argue that it was a clear goal scoring opportunity, on basis that you can’t put the keeper in the position he would have been in if he had not committed the offence. I didn’t think red at the time, I thought yellow and free kick.Adrian wrote:Yes, but that wasn't the case yesterday.Alan wrote:It could be though if he handled it and thereby prevented a goal or obvious goal scoring opportunity, couldn’t it?
He handled it in his own area and then carried it out.Alan wrote:Open to interpretation. If he picked it up when a daggers player would have beaten the last defender to the ball, you could argue that it was a clear goal scoring opportunity, on basis that you can’t put the keeper in the position he would have been in if he had not committed the offence. I didn’t think red at the time, I thought yellow and free kick.Adrian wrote:Yes, but that wasn't the case yesterday.Alan wrote:It could be though if he handled it and thereby prevented a goal or obvious goal scoring opportunity, couldn’t it?
The moment he takes possession then there can't be a an obvious goal scoring opportunity any more.
If he's not in the area when he first handles the it's different.