Line Up v Gateshead

Discuss all matters related to Dagenham and Redbridge
stanton101
Posts: 1483
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:56 am

Adrian wrote:
stanton101 wrote:So just for talks sake, ( and far be it that anyone dare question the messiahs tactics) could he not have played Doey at right back, put Staunton alongside Robson at centre back where they have played together before and moved Donnellan (primarily a midfielder, incidentally) up to partner Boucard in midfield?
Mind you that would mean no place for the midfield general that is guttridge ( the 15 game a season midfield genius) or the hugely ineffective Love child Frankie Raymond I suppose.
We could always play Williams at full back, oops!!!
How come you weren't so critical of Still when we were winning 5 in row?
Let's be honest you're utterly clueless. You dug out Guttridge earlier in the season for getting sent off when he wasn't. You complained about substitutions at 2-0 down when they'd all been made at 1-0.
Scott Doe has generally struggled at right back. Staunton played there earlier in the season a couple of times and also struggled. He's nothing like as good as you seem to want to make out.
Calm down you mug, people do get things wrong from time to time. But last time I looked this is a forum, where people are allowed to express their opinions. So what if we've won five in a row, look at the record before that, four points from a possible fifteen and a home defeat to Worthing in the FA trophy! Marvellous stuff. And look at the record since, 3 points from 12 and those 3 points we were outplayed by Bromley and had to rely on a worldie to bail us out.
Much as you don't like it, Jonny hoofs not all he's cracked up to be either pal.
Diggerthedog
Posts: 4104
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:08 pm

Adrian has a valid point where were you when we won 5 in a row? Any sniff of bad form and you jump on Still.

Your wrong about Still again seeing as he is the most successful manager at this level. Try again. What you need to understand is that we're pretty much small fry even at this level so to have turned the shower from last season around so quickly you have to say well done to Still. But you will never give him any credit even if went up. Watch you crawl back under your rock when we win next.

We're about 14th in attendances stats and people expect us to win every game and the league, crazy.
stanton101
Posts: 1483
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:56 am

Diggerthedog wrote:Adrian has a valid point where were you when we won 5 in a row? Any sniff of bad form and you jump on Still.

Your wrong about Still again seeing as he is the most successful manager at this level. Try again. What you need to understand is that we're pretty much small fry even at this level so to have turned the shower from last season around so quickly you have to say well done to Still. But you will never give him any credit even if went up. Watch you crawl back under your rock when we win next.

We're about 14th in attendances stats and people expect us to win every game and the league, crazy.
See what I mean, crawling back under a rock now is it? Nice, well done.
I don't expect us to win every game, but people were quick to slate Burnett for performances on the pitch and yet if the same happens to Still people like you are quick to jump to his defence. There's no difference in the way we're playing now from Burnetts days in charge. Double standards.
Diggerthedog
Posts: 4104
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:08 pm

No difference? You're either very dumb or trolling.
stanton101
Posts: 1483
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:56 am

Diggerthedog wrote:No difference? You're either very dumb or trolling.
Have your meds run out again.
Richie
Posts: 705
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 9:52 am

Nobody is claiming that Stilly has us playing well 100% of the time. But to claim it's the same as Wayne is laughable.

We're 4th!
stanton101
Posts: 1483
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:56 am

Richie wrote:Nobody is claiming that Stilly has us playing well 100% of the time. But to claim it's the same as Wayne is laughable.

We're 4th!
Come on mate, it's the conference. And the way we've been playing is no different to the way Burnett had us playing. This is a very poor league.
mickeyblue
Posts: 707
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 6:29 pm

mate your on your own with that.
can't prove it but I'd bet your left nut that Burnett have us mid table in this league at best.
but we finished 9th!
Post Reply