.png)
VOTE RESULT
-
Auntie Merge
- Posts: 2311
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:43 pm
Dagenham and Redbridge FC EGM Members vote result - vote 37 for Tamplin 11 against. In 2 months the paperwork will be completed.
-
canveydagger
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 8:44 pm
i thought we had about 70 members sounds like a few did not vote,
-
Voice of reason
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 11:15 am
So he'd have won even if he needed 75% of those attending
Amazing how few people it needed to make such a big change
Amazing how few people it needed to make such a big change
-
Diggerthedog
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:08 pm
The members who did not show up count as a no vote so it's still not the 75%. It was changed to 50/50 for one reason only.Voice of reason wrote:So he'd have won even if he needed 75% of those attending
Amazing how few people it needed to make such a big change
Bring on the legal battle.
-
canveydagger
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 8:44 pm
Diggerthedog wrote:The members who did not show up count as a no vote so it's still not the 75%. It was changed to 50/50 for one reason only.Voice of reason wrote:So he'd have won even if he needed 75% of those attending
Amazing how few people it needed to make such a big change
Bring on the legal battle.
Diggerthedog who going to pay for the legal battle it cost money
-
Diggerthedog
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:08 pm
You won't be laughing when you're asking for money in a bucket.
Do you have any proof that it was changed?Diggerthedog wrote:The members who did not show up count as a no vote so it's still not the 75%. It was changed to 50/50 for one reason only.Voice of reason wrote:So he'd have won even if he needed 75% of those attending
Amazing how few people it needed to make such a big change
Bring on the legal battle.
-
Diggerthedog
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:08 pm
No i heard it on Facebook via my aunts friends who is sister with a stewards dead grandma.Adrian wrote:Do you have any proof that it was changed?Diggerthedog wrote:The members who did not show up count as a no vote so it's still not the 75%. It was changed to 50/50 for one reason only.Voice of reason wrote:So he'd have won even if he needed 75% of those attending
Amazing how few people it needed to make such a big change
Bring on the legal battle.
Diggerthedog wrote:No i heard it on Facebook via my aunts friends who is sister with a stewards dead grandma.Adrian wrote:Do you have any proof that it was changed?Diggerthedog wrote:
The members who did not show up count as a no vote so it's still not the 75%. It was changed to 50/50 for one reason only.
Bring on the legal battle.
Thank you for the sarcasm. So what is this proof then?
-
DI Mike Dashwood
- Posts: 644
- Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2013 7:56 pm
And have you also had it confirmed that no shows count as no votes?? I believe proxy voting was available so I would imagine that no shows would count as an abstain vote??
Did a protest take place outside??
Did a protest take place outside??
-
Diggerthedog
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:08 pm
It's common knowledge. Ask any member.
Where is that in the company's articles/memorandum? Because my quick read of the companies act suggests that it allows a vote taken by poll to be passed by the requisite percentage of those who vote in person, by proxy or in advance. I think it's only a show of hands that is counted as you say - but I'm not a company lawyer. See 282(3) and 283(5) of the companies act.Diggerthedog wrote:The members who did not show up count as a no vote so it's still not the 75%. It was changed to 50/50 for one reason only.