No plan B
- Mike the Dagger
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 9:09 am
- Contact:
That is all.
Yep. Both in this game and the Southend game it was obvious that the system wasn't working and that we needed a change to give a physical presence up top. I know we have had a good run, but it's games like this that his critics see as exposing his tactical weakness.
-
- Posts: 1481
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:56 am
I must admit I was baffled by wayne's team selection today. I thought Doidge did well last week, yet he can't even get on as a sub. Jakubiak and Jones were like fior like subs replacing chambers and Luke at a time when we needed to mix it up a little. It's not as though teams like burton, southend and wycombe played us off the pitch, there's just no variation in our play. Very disappointed and annoyed that we've once again shot ourselves in the foot by being inept tactically. And does anyone else think obileye is becoming a liability?
For about an hour we more than matched them. We played with fight and looked like a team. The only think missing was a cutting edge. If there was someone up there to support Cureton and a lot less balls played to feet or on the floor, we could've got a result. The minute they score it was game over. Where was the reaction? Why was a boy sent on to do a man's job? Why was JC still left isolated? Why didn't Doidge play? All credit to the boys for their efforts, but sadly yet again our tactics and formation let us down....WB!!! Also, despite all the issues with Labadie, why was he on the bench? You just cant play Hemmings and Chambers in the same team.
Majority of their good chances came after the goal from what I can recall. Goals change games and all thatAlan wrote:Don't know about go either way, we forced an excellent save in first half and a routine one in the second, whereas they hit the bar, scored, forced Cousins into several good saves and had several goal mouth scrambles just before they scored.
-
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:17 pm
Obileye. A liability. I've heard it all. Arguably Ayo has been the difference between us being comfortably sitting in mid-table to being in a real relegation fight. Yes, sometimes Ayo plays poor balls forward, but you cannot expect a league two centre half to have amazing distribution. Defensively, Ayo is very strong and he doesn't lose the ball in dangerous areas, which you would have a right to criticise a defender at any level for.stanton101 wrote:I must admit I was baffled by wayne's team selection today. I thought Doidge did well last week, yet he can't even get on as a sub. Jakubiak and Jones were like fior like subs replacing chambers and Luke at a time when we needed to mix it up a little. It's not as though teams like burton, southend and wycombe played us off the pitch, there's just no variation in our play. Very disappointed and annoyed that we've once again shot ourselves in the foot by being inept tactically. And does anyone else think obileye is becoming a liability?
Ayo would be my player of the season if Cureton wasn't here.He made a couple of mistakes today which was 2 more than hes ever made in a daggers shirt ever.That boy will go all the way,he will play in the prem.
Bollix to Shampoo, it's real poo we want !
-
- Posts: 2619
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 2:47 am
Errrr one that came in about the 86th minute and perhaps a few more if their offside trap had been as good as Stevenage last week .Anyone of which would have got a resultTheLion wrote:A team of midgets! What chance does JC have against such big lumps!
Their number 9 playing with JC in a Daggers team would see us flying up the league, but WB prefers midgets.
-
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:37 pm
'Baffled by Wayne's team selection' is a massive overreaction.
It's clear why we played Doidge last week, it clear why Cureton was favoured this week. The only one that you ask questions about is Chambers, but with Labadie sensibly dropped he's the obvious choice to come back in in the same position that he played in the win over Plymouth (I assume it was the same position anyway, wasn't there for the Plymouth game).
It's clear why we played Doidge last week, it clear why Cureton was favoured this week. The only one that you ask questions about is Chambers, but with Labadie sensibly dropped he's the obvious choice to come back in in the same position that he played in the win over Plymouth (I assume it was the same position anyway, wasn't there for the Plymouth game).