I hate the cheap looking logo.... I totally agree that all previous clubs should have been incorporated into the design.
I think that there should have been a vote on the final design by the fans... Especially respecting the 'oldies' who are pre 1992.
Once again, Thompson has got it wrong!!!
Logo
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2013 1:08 am
Tell me when he gets something right. Have a whip round for a tandem, so that he can ride off into the sunset with WB.
- Auntie Merge
- Posts: 2311
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:43 pm
-
- Posts: 674
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 10:54 pm
- Location: Walking In A Woodall Wonderland
I can't believe some of the smugness and self-promotion in this thread
-
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 1:39 pm
What people seem to have missed is that the INITIAL intention was that the club had intended on retaining our initial badge. This would be used for official paperwork and such like within the club.
The logo was being brought in to used for marketing purposes, to become more recognisable to the outside public. Would be seen on SSN - in news papers etc etc.
What ISNT being told to people however is that the club are allegedly looking to change this stance and now want to try and abolish the existing badge altogether.
The logo was being brought in to used for marketing purposes, to become more recognisable to the outside public. Would be seen on SSN - in news papers etc etc.
What ISNT being told to people however is that the club are allegedly looking to change this stance and now want to try and abolish the existing badge altogether.