Views from the Sieve

With Chambo currently dividing opinion I thought it might be worth running a poll.

Option 3: Let John Still decide on a game to game basis:

I think he's unfairly slated to be honest. He's miles ahead of everyone assist-wise, and knows where the goal is too.

Definitely unfair stick imo

I dont think a single fan has ever said he should be replicating Lionel Messi but for League 2 standard is a steady player who always puts in a shift for the side. I've always and still thought he needed to work on his final ball / shooting but as the old argument goes, if he were any better he wouldnt be playing for us.

Since Stilly has actually been playing him in what I consider to be his most favourable position he's been far more effective.

Mike the Dagger wrote:Option 3: Let John Still decide on a game to game basis:

This is exactly my thought on Chambers - if he's playing well, keep him in - if not, give him a breather.

I think he's poor defensively therefore should not be played in the wing. He makes me feel the same way as Elito made me feel offensively (not counting his last season with us).

Mike the Dagger wrote:Option 3: Let John Still decide on a game to game basis:

THIS

I find we have an unlucky result against a strong side and suddenly the idiots on here are picking on one player.

I wasn't at the game, but whatever chambers did or didn't do, he doesn't deserve this.

These polls are starting to grow a bit tiresome.

EVERY player played well Saturday.
Another day Chambers gets 2 and we win.
He was a little unlucky with his chances.

This thread/poll is brilliant.

A couple of people say that they don't think Chambers is good enough and point out that he pulls out of challenges and it prompts this silly poll, and someone calling them idiots.

I've been told many times that everyone is entitled to express their opinion. Why does that not apply to those that think Chambers isn't good?

When Burnett was manager I think he was quite rightly left out of the starting XI on a regular basis. He didn't put in enough defensive effort for me. He also infuriated me by doing all the hard work to get in front of goal, and then just fumbling around without shooting or passing. However, you can't ignore the fact that he's been one of our main forms of goals under Still. Maybe it's just coincidence or maybe Still has found away to get the best out of him. But regardless of the reason one thing is for certain- if it ain't broken, don't fix it.

In the team.

Adrian wrote:This thread/poll is brilliant.

A couple of people say that they don't think Chambers is good enough and point out that he pulls out of challenges and it prompts this silly poll, and someone calling them idiots.

I've been told many times that everyone is entitled to express their opinion. Why does that not apply to those that think Chambers isn't good?

So the thread said Chambers Poll and you opened it and posted are you retarded?

In the hole plays, anyway else doesn't in my humble opinion.

I don't think it's a stupid question, purely someone opening up a debate, what's the harm in that? For the record, I think Chambers is ok at the moment and fitting the team well. On current form, I'd keep him in. However team selection should be done on a game by game basis, so my opinion in a couple of weeks might be different

Too inconsistent for me. Cureton is better.

86% voting in right now.He's 1st name on my team sheet right now.Puts in a shift causes a bit of disruption to the other team.Unlike Jody Jones or Jamie Cureton these days.He has some flaws,maybe Johny Hoof can iron them out.Whats he got to do ?? Its Dagenham not Barcelona.