Page 1 of 2
in the sun???
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 7:54 am
by durnzo
It's reported in the sun, page 58, that burnetts gone today and Hackett and currie are in temporary charge til someone else is found.
Re: in the sun???
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 7:55 am
by Mark
Would be pointless sacking him and letting those 2 stay imo. They've all been partly responsible for the least enjoyable daggers side since I started watching in the 90s.
Re: in the sun???
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 7:57 am
by Chigwellian
We have a thug as a co-manager now. .. Couldn't make it up... If it's true
Re: in the sun???
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 8:00 am
by bearaab
With the logic of people on here, it was Burnett's fault when Still had that terrible run of about 20 games.
Re: in the sun???
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 8:49 am
by DI Mike Dashwood
It was also mentioned in Tony Cascarino's column in the Times this morning.
Re: in the sun???
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:00 am
by Diggerthedog
Hackett can do one he is a job for the boys, Currie comes across decent during interviews.
Re: in the sun???
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:34 am
by Auntie Merge
durnzo wrote:It's reported in the sun, page 58, that burnetts gone today and Hackett and currie are in temporary charge til someone else is found.
Disappointed if that is the case. All three need to go immediately.
Re: in the sun???
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 10:09 am
by TheLion
All three should go, but as ever, the cost will dictate.
I am sure that John Still has been paid up by Luton, so perhaps he could do the decent thing and work at a price we can afford.
Re: in the sun???
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 10:27 am
by BarkingRambo
Assuming Still is coming back I doubt he would get rid of Currie and Hackett. Both were employed in coaching roles while Still was in charge so he likes something about them and its cheaper for the club to not get rid of them.
Re: in the sun???
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 11:34 am
by Richie
Diggerthedog wrote:Hackett can do one he is a job for the boys, Currie comes across decent during interviews.
Because how they interview is what it should be based on.
Re: in the sun???
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:12 pm
by Diggerthedog
Richie wrote:Diggerthedog wrote:Hackett can do one he is a job for the boys, Currie comes across decent during interviews.
Because how they interview is what it should be based on.
My point being is the other two are complete knobs and unprofessional, Currie has been nothing but professional.
Re: in the sun???
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:28 pm
by ARNU
Diggerthedog wrote:Richie wrote:Diggerthedog wrote:Hackett can do one he is a job for the boys, Currie comes across decent during interviews.
Because how they interview is what it should be based on.
My point being is the other two are complete knobs and unprofessional, Currie has been nothing but professional.
You speak lots of sense Digger !.....oh sorry did I say sense ? I meant BOLLOX LOL!!
Re: in the sun???
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:45 pm
by Diggerthedog
Lol? What are you a ten year old? Mental age probably but would expect nothing less from a West Ham fan.
Re: in the sun???
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:47 pm
by ARNU
Diggerthedog wrote:Lol? What are you a ten year old? Mental age probably but would expect nothing less from a West Ham fan.
Who do you support then ?
Re: in the sun???
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:49 pm
by Diggerthedog
ARNU wrote:Diggerthedog wrote:Lol? What are you a ten year old? Mental age probably but would expect nothing less from a West Ham fan.
Who do you support then ?
:roll: :roll: :roll: