in the sun???

Discuss all matters related to Dagenham and Redbridge
durnzo
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2015 1:28 pm
Location: Dagenham

It's reported in the sun, page 58, that burnetts gone today and Hackett and currie are in temporary charge til someone else is found.
Mark
Posts: 1550
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:04 pm

Would be pointless sacking him and letting those 2 stay imo. They've all been partly responsible for the least enjoyable daggers side since I started watching in the 90s.
Chigwellian
Posts: 619
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:18 pm

We have a thug as a co-manager now. .. Couldn't make it up... If it's true
bearaab
Posts: 646
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:12 pm

With the logic of people on here, it was Burnett's fault when Still had that terrible run of about 20 games.
DI Mike Dashwood
Posts: 641
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2013 7:56 pm

It was also mentioned in Tony Cascarino's column in the Times this morning.
Diggerthedog
Posts: 3893
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:08 pm

Hackett can do one he is a job for the boys, Currie comes across decent during interviews.
User avatar
Auntie Merge
Posts: 2178
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:43 pm

durnzo wrote:It's reported in the sun, page 58, that burnetts gone today and Hackett and currie are in temporary charge til someone else is found.
Disappointed if that is the case. All three need to go immediately.
TheLion
Posts: 130
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 3:00 pm

All three should go, but as ever, the cost will dictate.

I am sure that John Still has been paid up by Luton, so perhaps he could do the decent thing and work at a price we can afford.
BarkingRambo
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2015 11:53 am

Assuming Still is coming back I doubt he would get rid of Currie and Hackett. Both were employed in coaching roles while Still was in charge so he likes something about them and its cheaper for the club to not get rid of them.
Richie
Posts: 705
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 9:52 am

Diggerthedog wrote:Hackett can do one he is a job for the boys, Currie comes across decent during interviews.
Because how they interview is what it should be based on.
Diggerthedog
Posts: 3893
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:08 pm

Richie wrote:
Diggerthedog wrote:Hackett can do one he is a job for the boys, Currie comes across decent during interviews.
Because how they interview is what it should be based on.
My point being is the other two are complete knobs and unprofessional, Currie has been nothing but professional.
User avatar
ARNU
Posts: 3746
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:43 pm

Diggerthedog wrote:
Richie wrote:
Diggerthedog wrote:Hackett can do one he is a job for the boys, Currie comes across decent during interviews.
Because how they interview is what it should be based on.
My point being is the other two are complete knobs and unprofessional, Currie has been nothing but professional.
You speak lots of sense Digger !.....oh sorry did I say sense ? I meant BOLLOX LOL!!
Bollix to Shampoo, it's real poo we want !
Diggerthedog
Posts: 3893
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:08 pm

Lol? What are you a ten year old? Mental age probably but would expect nothing less from a West Ham fan.
User avatar
ARNU
Posts: 3746
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:43 pm

Diggerthedog wrote:Lol? What are you a ten year old? Mental age probably but would expect nothing less from a West Ham fan.
Who do you support then ?
Bollix to Shampoo, it's real poo we want !
Diggerthedog
Posts: 3893
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:08 pm

ARNU wrote:
Diggerthedog wrote:Lol? What are you a ten year old? Mental age probably but would expect nothing less from a West Ham fan.
Who do you support then ?
:roll: :roll: :roll:
Post Reply