.png)
new away kit
-
Mike the Dagger
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 9:09 am
- Contact:
Quite nice apart from the "surrender" badge.
-
Chigwellian
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:18 pm
Yeah, it is a nice shirt, but like the others have said, it's the badge that lets it down, and for that reason I won't be buying it.
-
Auntie Merge
- Posts: 2318
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:43 pm
Actually that is quite good except for the crappy badge.
I would have bought one but not with that badge.
I would have bought one but not with that badge.
-
mickeyblue
- Posts: 707
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 6:29 pm
i understand the badge is crap and 90% of people dont like it but hey that shirt is still nice and we need the funds so is a no brainer buy the bloody thing.
anybody think we will change the badge?
anybody think we will change the badge?
but we finished 9th!
-
DaggerJoel11
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 7:14 pm
- Location: Becontree
- Contact:
Really like this kit, very unique. Also like the fact that we've incorporated red and blue, rather than generic green/light blue etc which mean nothing to us.
-
RayleighDagger1986
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 7:01 pm
What other income streams that the club controls that could increase revenue?
Let's start with the bar/clubhouse. It seems less appealing these days with so few using it compared with 5-10 years ago. Merchandise has been mentioned (club shop etc). How about naming rights on the ground. I wouldn't expect Barking & Dagenham borough council paying sponsorship rights??? So is a trick missing here?
All I am saying here is we have missed opportunities to maximise revenue!
Let's start with the bar/clubhouse. It seems less appealing these days with so few using it compared with 5-10 years ago. Merchandise has been mentioned (club shop etc). How about naming rights on the ground. I wouldn't expect Barking & Dagenham borough council paying sponsorship rights??? So is a trick missing here?
All I am saying here is we have missed opportunities to maximise revenue!
-
Auntie Merge
- Posts: 2318
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:43 pm
Are we still the Chigwell Constuction Stadium? Think you'll find we've been selling naming rights on the ground for a while...RayleighDagger1986 wrote:What other income streams that the club controls that could increase revenue?
Let's start with the bar/clubhouse. It seems less appealing these days with so few using it compared with 5-10 years ago. Merchandise has been mentioned (club shop etc). How about naming rights on the ground. I wouldn't expect Barking & Dagenham borough council paying sponsorship rights??? So is a trick missing here?
All I am saying here is we have missed opportunities to maximise revenue!
-
Chigwellian
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:18 pm
Erm.... Check out walthamstow Avenue and IlfordDaggerJoel11 wrote:Really like this kit, very unique. Also like the fact that we've incorporated red and blue, rather than generic green/light blue etc which mean nothing to us.
-
RayleighDagger1986
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 7:01 pm
You are absolutely right Auntie Merge. I had one of those moments....
Do we know how much we sold the rights for that naming?
Do we know how much we sold the rights for that naming?
-
Diggerthedog
- Posts: 4101
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:08 pm
Chigwellian wrote:Erm.... Check out walthamstow Avenue and IlfordDaggerJoel11 wrote:Really like this kit, very unique. Also like the fact that we've incorporated red and blue, rather than generic green/light blue etc which mean nothing to us.
This kid is about 10 sure he does not know what colour kits our forerunners wore 30 years ago.
As for the kit it's quite decent, I will get one regardless it's all money back to the club.
-
AVincelotFlyingLeap
- Posts: 677
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 10:54 pm
- Location: Walking In A Woodall Wonderland
It's fit. We are going to look beautiful as we walk the title next season