What utter rubbish.Stewy.b wrote:Biggest game of our season, no fight,no passion,no heart!
There was no lack of fight and passion.
What's lacking is ability.
Agree with Adrian here there was fight but some of them are really not up to being professional footballers.Adrian wrote:What utter rubbish.Stewy.b wrote:Biggest game of our season, no fight,no passion,no heart!
There was no lack of fight and passion.
What's lacking is ability.
Fully agree with this. Really don't think you can fault their effort - they just aren't good enoughAdrian wrote:What utter rubbish.Stewy.b wrote:Biggest game of our season, no fight,no passion,no heart!
There was no lack of fight and passion.
What's lacking is ability.
And this coming from a bloke who thinks Labadie, our best midfielder, shouldn't play! He can't give anyone a bollocking public or otherwise because it would reveal his own shortcomings as a manager. It's called keeping everyone sweet and yourself in a job,which miraculously he will do, due to the boards reluctance to look outside the box. As for the much maligned Hyam it's best to play him instead of clevid only fair because he did sign him much the same as Hawkins getting the nod over Doidge I suppose. Keep it sweet Jonny boy, deflect the blame, it pulls the wool over the fans eyes, well some of us anyway.Adrian wrote:What? I knew you'd failed.to understand what I've said before, but didn't realise you'd failed this badly.stanton101 wrote:Do you think it's ok for JS to bollock them now, or are the little darlings to fragile? If I were him I'd keep my head down, because he matches the team. SHIT.Adrian wrote:After the first ten minutes we were the better team for the whole first half.
Then we give away a soft goal and that's it.
Not sure why Hyam gets singled out.although I imagine the reason he plays is because we don't have an abundance of centre halves not playing.
I'd question why Labadie plays. Today he fluffed a great gave to put a ball across the face of goal because he's too concerned with trying to get fouled.
Their goal came from him giving away stupid free kick.
If he spent half he effort he puts into diving or stupid fouls into playing football he'd be playing at a higher level.
I said before that he would be bollocking them where it was needed and that he'd be doing it in private.
Yes, I think Labadie shouldn't play when he's putting more effort into falling over or giving away stupid fouls than he is actually playing football. If he used that effort to play football I'd be quite happy to see him play.stanton101 wrote:And this coming from a bloke who thinks Labadie, our best midfielder, shouldn't play! He can't give anyone a bollocking public or otherwise because it would reveal his own shortcomings as a manager. It's called keeping everyone sweet and yourself in a job,which miraculously he will do, due to the boards reluctance to look outside the box. As for the much maligned Hyam it's best to play him instead of clevid only fair because he did sign him much the same as Hawkins getting the nod over Doidge I suppose. Keep it sweet Jonny boy, deflect the blame, it pulls the wool over the fans eyes, well some of us anyway.Adrian wrote:What? I knew you'd failed.to understand what I've said before, but didn't realise you'd failed this badly.stanton101 wrote: Do you think it's ok for JS to bollock them now, or are the little darlings to fragile? If I were him I'd keep my head down, because he matches the team. SHIT.
I said before that he would be bollocking them where it was needed and that he'd be doing it in private.
He wasn't at Viccy Road that's for sure!The Romford Dagger wrote:After 50 mins Jeff Stelling went to the guy doing our game and he said it was a passionate performance from both teams and a great game of football.
I laughed. Surely not?
If he was he was pissed!daggersjeff wrote:He wasn't at Viccy Road that's for sure!The Romford Dagger wrote:After 50 mins Jeff Stelling went to the guy doing our game and he said it was a passionate performance from both teams and a great game of football.
I laughed. Surely not?