To those who went yesterday...
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2014 6:54 am
What happened with Wayne at half time? Little explanation online for the sending off... seems strange when we were two one up at the time
The Independent Dagenham and Redbridge forum
https://www.viewsfromthesieve.co.uk/
Apparently Wayne moaned to the ref about Newport's goal because there was 2 mins added but they scored in 4th min.Lcbdagger wrote:What happened with Wayne at half time? Little explanation online for the sending off... seems strange when we were two one up at the time
Had every right to. According to my watch the goal went in at 49 mins 32 seconds. Ok allow 30 seconds for both the bookings where the other 90 seconds came from.matt_drfc wrote:Apparently Wayne moaned to the ref about Newport's goal because there was 2 mins added but they scored in 4th min.Lcbdagger wrote:What happened with Wayne at half time? Little explanation online for the sending off... seems strange when we were two one up at the time
Getting sent off over added time is stupid. .SUSSEX DAGGER wrote:
Had every right to. According to my watch the goal went in at 49 mins 32 seconds. Ok allow 30 seconds for both the bookings where the other 90 seconds came from.
The ball never went out of play during the added time. He might also have had something to say about the penalty.Daggers No 2 Fan wrote:Getting sent off over added time is stupid. .SUSSEX DAGGER wrote:
Had every right to. According to my watch the goal went in at 49 mins 32 seconds. Ok allow 30 seconds for both the bookings where the other 90 seconds came from.
The announced added time is always a minimum anyway, so 2 minutes and 59 seconds to play could be announced as 2 minutes minimum.
Goal was scored after 3 mins and 43 seconds of added time according to the BBC. Two fouls and two booking in added time, would take it pretty close to that.SUSSEX DAGGER wrote:The ball never went out of play during the added time. He might also have had something to say about the penalty.Daggers No 2 Fan wrote:Getting sent off over added time is stupid. .SUSSEX DAGGER wrote:
Had every right to. According to my watch the goal went in at 49 mins 32 seconds. Ok allow 30 seconds for both the bookings where the other 90 seconds came from.
The announced added time is always a minimum anyway, so 2 minutes and 59 seconds to play could be announced as 2 minutes minimum.
It's total nonsense that they show a number for added time then play until someone scores like its a Senrab match tbh. How long does it take to write down "7 Elito" anyway. Azeez was booked after the original 2 minutes were already up.Daggers No 2 Fan wrote:
Goal was scored after 3 mins and 43 seconds of added time according to the BBC. Two fouls and two booking in added time, would take it pretty close to that.
The time is a minimum, not a maximum. Azeez was booked after 2 minutes, but close enough to Elitos that it would have been in the time added for that.Mike the Dagger wrote:It's total nonsense that they show a number for added time then play until someone scores like its a Senrab match tbh. How long does it take to write down "7 Elito" anyway. Azeez was booked after the original 2 minutes were already up.Daggers No 2 Fan wrote:
Goal was scored after 3 mins and 43 seconds of added time according to the BBC. Two fouls and two booking in added time, would take it pretty close to that.
"Standard" added time seems to be 1 minute first half ands 3 minutes second half unless a player has died on the pitch at some point, To even come up with 2 in the first half is unusual - 2 goals and a substitution would lead you to think maybe 90 seconds or so. To put up two, then manage to find another two from somewhere and then have them score that late on, I can understand the gaffer getting a bit heated, especially as we have made such a habit of letting leads slip lately.
He's human not a robot and obviously cares a lot, and its not really that daft of him to lose it, given the whistle then goes about a minute later, giving him the chance to exchange views with the ref.
Yep, know all that about time being a minimum, however as i recall it, the reason they now announce added time it to save the referee from the situation where only he knows what is left and the confusion, frustration and doubt that used to cause sometimes late in games. Having shown 2 to then play into a fifth minute without any major obvious further delay is worse than not having shown the time at all in terms of confusion, frustration and doubt and opens up the referee to major issues if one team then goes and scores in that time, just like on Wednesday.Daggers No 2 Fan wrote: The time is a minimum, not a maximum. Azeez was booked after 2 minutes, but close enough to Elitos that it would have been in the time added for that.
Losing it with the ref is pointless, he isn't going to turn around and chalk off the goal.
Second time the manager has now been sent to the stands. What exactly has he achieves other than making a tit of himself and potentially getting a fine and ban?
I've always thought that Managers have one of the worst matchday views being that low down..bet there's quite a few who'd prefer to be in the hospitality boxes!ARNU wrote:...Probably had a better view.