dagger4eva wrote:Really? How do you come to the conclusion that we should be underdogs?
D&R: Full Time / Whitehawk: Park Time:
D&R: Professional / Whitehawk: Semi Professional
D&R: League 2 / Whitehawk: Vanarama South.
D&R: Train almost every day / Whitehawk: Train twice a week
D&R: Total wage budget probably 2 or 3 times greater than Whitehawk
Current Match Odds: D&R: 11/8 / Whitehawk: 9/5
Shall I continue ??
By myself and admin knew this was going to be no walk in the park the moment the draw was made.
But try this for size.
Whitehawk Manager said after their game Saturday he will make 9 changes Wednesday, he obviously knows his best team. Ours clearly does not.
Whitehawk in the first game grew in confidence as the game wore on, D and R despite being in the lead were shaking like shiting dogs long before their equaliser. Expect the same Wednesday if we do not take complete control.
In the first game yes they played football at times but they put balls into the box trying to find players who had the physical attributes I.e height. We played hoofball upto one of the smallest players on the pitch.
Whitehawk Players look like they know where they should be playing , ours don't.
Whitehawk play to their strengths we don't.
Whitehawk will use the u usual conditions to their advantage.
Whitehawk look prepared to have a crack at goal at every opportunity, we are shot shy.
Whitehawk play with belief and passion , we don't.
Whitehawk defenders did the basic first game, we did not and have not for a very very long time.
The list is endless and for many reasons the bookies odds are wrong. That does not mean The Daggers can't win but it still makes the odds Wrong in my book
.png)
