Mike..... Two questions for you. The first is why have you waited until now to disclose these emails? Second question is have you from the outset been of the view that we should stay as we are? Mike has stated several times in the past that the Easts were asked to respond/give interviews but chose ...

It's a shame that the Easts Consortium have pulled out. By being involved they have forced improvements to the Tamplin bid which the board seemed unable or unwilling to secure and so we are in a much better position than we were.

Not in the Interview Gerry gave on Phoenix. I am pretty sure that he said that if you want to buy something you pay for it, you don't pay for it in instalments. Happy to be corrected if my recollection is wrong.

Agree, but their side criticised him for paying in instalments, so if it's sauce for the goose, its sauce for the gander is what I am saying.

No more strange than the Easts' consortium objecting to Tamplin paying by instalments, yet now proposing to pay by instalments, or the Easts increasing the value of their bid to 225% of the sum first offered - they tried to improve their bid to meet the main criticism of not enough money, he's alter...

Alan......in response to your two posts I would respond as follows.i would strongly urge the easts to have another interview with Mike. Tbh I found the easts interview to be fair but again not pressed enough imo. I think it is sad that the easts had to serve a s303on the club so there bid could be ...

Adrian......see the first posting in this thread. Biased example the legal obstacle comment. The easts have only ever gone down the legal channel twice. Once to get there offer on the agenda at an egm.lets be honest without them serving a legal notice on the board there offer would never have been ...

Adrian......see the first posting in this thread. Biased example the legal obstacle comment. The easts have only ever gone down the legal channel twice. Once to get there offer on the agenda at an egm.lets be honest without them serving a legal notice on the board there offer would never have been ...

So somebody has taken offence from an offensive chant and our defence is..... we didn't mean to offend you. Outstanding.

Anyway, can anyone actually say what this song was?

As well as paedophiles jimmy saville and arse sex do we have a song about disabled children as well now then ? What was the badly timed chant? What lyrical masterpiece is this ? Arnu prepare to be told that "it's just banter and what happens at football, they shouldn't be offended, etc..."

Agreed. Transformation from the relegation with a whimper from last season.

Can I point out that this poll allows you to pick 2 options, so seems flawed as you can't vote for both consortia in real life.

It's hard to know what is serious or sarcy on here at moment, so at risk of getting whoosshhhed (do we still get that on here), are you being serious MB?? I thought the pitch on Saturday looked top quality. A look back at the pitch from 2000/2001 during the FA Cup run will show you the pitch has no...

The word "forum" was used by Tamplin in the interview with Mike. It doesn't say before the vote though!

The Easts have nothing, except the cost of room hire, to lose.